Eating Away at Science
The sugar industry is fighting findings that link
its product to obesity. And U.S. officials are echoing the companies' line.
Mother Jones, May-June 04, by Chris Mooney
The Bush administration took
an extraordinary step early this year to defend the interests of U.S. sugar producers and the packaged-food industry, both
of which count top executives among the president's biggest fundraisers.
In January, the Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS) sent a letter to the World Health Organization with dozens of objections to the scientific
findings that underlie the WHO's effort to issue anti-obesity guidelines. Only eight months earlier, U.S. sugar manufacturers
and other food industry groups had called for "the personal intervention" of HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson and urged him to
challenge the WHO's scientific findings about obesity-most notably a dietary recommendation to limit consumption of sugar.
Sugar producers and the packaged-food
industry have a big economic stake and liability risk in the outcome of this debate. Obesity-related medical costs totaled
$75 billion in 2003 in the United States alone, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and obesity
is closing in on tobacco as the nation's leading cause of preventable death. Meanwhile, diet-related chronic conditions like
heart disease and type II diabetes have overtaken infectious diseases as the leading cause of death world-- wide. If obesity
is deemed as merely the result of an individual's lifestyle choices, then companies involved in producing unhealthy foods
are off the hook. But if such products are seen as causing obesity, then the sugar and packaged-food industries could be in
trouble. The draft version of the WHO's anti-obesity strategy, for instance, recommended taxing junk food and providing government
subsidies for healthier products.
The final WHO guidelines
are scheduled to be approved this summer, and before drafting them the WHO produced a summary of the scientific research,
which finds a connection between obesity and unhealthy diets, including too much consumption of sugar and fatty foods. In
April 2003, after this report was released, the Sugar Association and the Corn Refiners Association (which makes high-fructose
corn syrup, the leading soft-- drink sweetener) mobilized to have the findings revised. Not only did they call on HHS to take
action, but the Sugar Association also wrote to the WHO threatening to have its allies in Congress eliminate the organization's
U.S. finding if the WHO didn't rethink its anti-obesity work.
The industry's leaders and
representatives are certainly well positioned to make their views known in Washington, particularly to the president and his
top advisers. The Bush campaign acknowledges, for instance, that its "Rangers"-fundraisers who bundle at least $200,000 in
donations-include the sugar magnate Jose "Pepe" Fanjul Jr.; Richard F. Hohlt, a 2003 lobbyist for Altria, which owns Kraft
Foods; and Robert Leebern Jr., a lobbyist who last year represented Coca-Cola. And in the campaign's class of "Pioneers"--
bundlers of a minimum of $100,000-there's Robert A. Coker, a United States Sugar Corp. senior vice president; Barclay Resler,
Coca-- Cola's vice president of Government Relations; and Joe Weller, the chairman and CEO of Nestle USA.
The sugar and food industry
associations contend that the WHO's global strategy fails to recognize that personal lifestyle choices are as much a cause
of obesity as diet. And in January, when the Bush administration sent its comments to the WHO, it raised exactly those objections,
echoing the industry's mantra of individuals taking "personal responsibility." In a 28-page letter, the HHS Office of Global
Health Affairs director William R. Steiger, who happens to be George H.W. Bush's godson, notes that the administration "supports
personal responsibility to choose a diet conducive to individual energy balance, weight control, and health." The letter goes
on to criticize the WHO scientific report's "linking of fruit and vegetable consumption to decreased risk of obesity," along
with many of its other scientific findings. In response to these and other objections, the WHO decided to revise its guidelines.
HHS spokesman Bill Pierce
denies that industry groups helped in drafting the department's criticisms. But, nonetheless, its January letter to the WHO
discusses the value of industry input. "HHS would encourage the WHO to add more language on the role of industry and/or trade
groups in addressing diet and nutrition," the critique says, "especially those representing the food and beverage industries."
© 2001-2004 The Foundation for National Progress